Disciplinary Action and The Internet

Jul 29, 2025

Introduction: A Changing Workplace Landscape

In the digital age, the line between professional and personal conduct has blurred. Employees are increasingly using the internet and social media – sometimes in ways that impact the workplace. South African employers are facing new challenges when it comes to inappropriate online behaviour, even outside of work hours.

This is where disciplinary action related to internet use becomes relevant. While the Labour Relations Act (LRA) remains the foundation for fair labour practice, its principles are now applied in the context of tweets, Facebook posts, TikTok videos, and emails.

 

When the Internet Leads to Disciplinary Action

Employees can face disciplinary action for a range of internet-related behaviours, including:

  • Misuse of company internet during working hours (e.g., excessive personal browsing, accessing inappropriate sites).
  • Social media misconduct such as offensive posts, hate speech, or publicly criticising the employer.
  • Breach of confidentiality or sharing sensitive company information online.
  • Cyberbullying or harassment of colleagues via digital platforms.

Example:

An employee posts racist comments on Facebook over the weekend. A colleague sees it and reports it. The employer investigates and takes disciplinary steps – even though the conduct happened outside of work. Why? Because it harms the employment relationship and damages the employer’s reputation.

 

Case Law Examples

Sedick & Another v Krisray (Pty) Ltd (2011)

Two employees posted disparaging remarks about their employer on Facebook. Even though their profiles were private, the content reached others within the workplace. The CCMA upheld their dismissal, ruling that the posts breached the trust relationship.

Recent TikTok & WhatsApp Cases

In more recent cases, employees have faced suspension or dismissal for recording videos in uniform, sharing memes that ridicule the employer, or sending offensive voice notes. The CCMA and Labour Court consistently weigh whether the conduct harmed the employment relationship or violated clear company policies.

What Employers Must Prove

To take fair disciplinary action, employers must follow substantive and procedural fairness, as outlined in the Code of Good Practice: Dismissal (Schedule 8 of the LRA).

They must show:

  1. There was a rule or standard regulating internet/social media conduct.
  2. The employee was aware of the rule (e.g., through an IT policy or code of conduct).
  3. The employee breached the rule.
  4. The breach was serious enough to justify the disciplinary action taken (e.g., warning, suspension, or dismissal).
  5. A fair procedure was followed

Importance of Clear Policies

Employers should have clear, accessible policies on:

  • Acceptable use of the internet and emails.
  • Social media conduct (during and outside working hours).
  • Protection of confidential information.
  • Disciplinary consequences for violations.

Employees should be trained on these policies and asked to acknowledge them in writing.

 

What Employees Should Know

  • Think before you post – even on personal devices and accounts.
  • Don’t assume privacy – if something can be shared, it can be used against you.
  • Respect confidentiality – leaking company information online can lead to dismissal.
  • Follow the disciplinary procedure – employees have the right to a fair hearing, representation, and to challenge evidence.

Conclusion: Digital Conduct Matters

The internet is not a lawless space. What employees do online can have real-world consequences – especially if it affects the workplace. Both employers and employees must navigate this space with caution, guided by the principles of fairness, respect, and accountability under South African labour law.

 

Sources:
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) Guidelines.

Leading case law cases:
Sedick & Another v Krisray (Pty) Ltd [2011] 8 BALR 879 (CCMA)
Media Workers Association of SA obo Mvemve v Kathorus Community Radio [2013] JOL 30984 (CCMA)
Gosai v CCMA and Others (JR1305/14) [2016] ZALCJHB 196
Numsa obo Nganezi v Dunlop Mixing and Technical Services (Pty) Ltd & Others [2019] ZACC 25

Disclaimer: LabourMan exclusively provides services to employers.

The content does not constitute legal advice, are not intended to be a substitute for legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Kindly contact us on info@labourman.co.za or 021 556 1075 to speak to one of our consultants.

Author:

Wallace Albertyn

Wallace Albertyn is a Senior Associate and Legal Advisor at LabourMan Consultants.
Tags:

Recent LabourTalk Articles

Internal Advancement and Promotion Opportunities

Internal Advancement and Promotion Opportunities

In a recent Labour Court case, City of Cape Town v Irwin Oostendorp and Others, C530/2022, 05 August 2025, Acting Labour Court Judge Coen de Kock, in summary, made the following...

Dismissal After Reaching Retirement Age

Dismissal After Reaching Retirement Age

Introduction Dismissal on the grounds of age is generally considered automatically unfair discrimination in terms of the Employment Equity Act (EEA) and the Labour Relations...

The Impact of Company Liquidation on Employees

The Impact of Company Liquidation on Employees

Introduction South African law has developed a framework, principally through the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936, the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (LRA) and the Basic Conditions of...

LabourTalk Newsletters

Subscribe and receive labour related information

Follow us

Review-Us

 

© 2025 ~ All Rights Reserved  |  Privacy Policy