Reading employee emails

Nov 26, 2015


It is clear that an employee’s privacy is important.  The law prohibits uncontrolled access to an employee’s private  communications. However, it does provide the employer with some rights of access under certain conditions. The Interception Act allows an employer to intercept an employee’s communications. There is also the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPI) that is important and employers should observe its provisions.
The content of an employee’s e-mail may be read under four conditions. They are:

  1. When the employer has been authorised in writing by the employee to do so;
  2. When the employer has very real grounds for suspecting that some form of abuse is taking place;
  3. When the employer has informed the employee concerned in advance that the e-mails might be intercepted; and
  4. When the e-mail was sent in the course of the employer’s business.

It has to be borne in mind that at present it is unclear what the Interception Act means by the phrase ‘in the course of your company’s business’.
If this includes private e-mails sent during business hours, then this may give the employer the right to read them. But if it only means the employer can look at e-mails sent for business reasons then this is not a licence to read private emails, even if they are sent during business hours.
Until the courts provide clarity on this issue, employers need to tread extremely carefully in this area. The four instances in which employees’ e-mails are allowed to be read will ensure that employers do not infringe on employees’ privacy.

Disclaimer: LabourMan exclusively provides services to employers.

The content does not constitute legal advice, are not intended to be a substitute for legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Kindly contact us on or 021 556 1075 to speak to one of our consultants.


Wallace Albertyn

Wallace Albertyn is a Senior Associate and Legal Advisor at LabourMan Consultants.

Recent LabourTalk Articles

Dismissal of Prolonged Cases by the CCMA

Dismissal of Prolonged Cases by the CCMA

Introduction The case of South African Airways(SOC) Limited (in Business Rescue) and Others v National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Members and Others (JA32/2020)...

Digital Evidence v Artificial Evidence

Digital Evidence v Artificial Evidence

With the proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI), it has never been easier to manipulate messages, videos or graphics. Therefore, the integrity of digital evidence in the...

LabourTalk Newsletters

Subscribe and receive labour related information

Follow us



© 2024 ~ All Rights Reserved  |  Privacy Policy