Dismissal of an arrested employee

Jul 26, 2017


How do the courts deal with the dismissal of an arrested employee when the trust relationship has been damaged?

Case law: Visser vs Woolworths [2005] 11 BALR 1216 – Dismissal of an arrested employee when the trust relationship has been affected.

The facts of the case: In Visser vs Woolworths [2005] 11 BALR 1216, an employee was arrested on a charge of theft from a department store owned by a Woolworths’ competitor.
Before she was convicted, Woolworths dismissed her due to her arrest. This was on the grounds that she had a number of subordinates who were supposed to look up to her and she could no longer be trusted.
What the court ruled:
The arbitrator recognised Woolworths’ right to dismiss an employee if the trust relationship has been irrevocably damaged. But, as Woolworths did not prove Visser was guilty of theft and had not even tried to, it could not show Visser could not be trusted. The dismissal was found to be unfair and Woolworths had to pay Visser eight months’ remuneration.
What can be learned from the case?
If an employer can prove the arrest destroyed the trust relationship, it may be justified in terminating the employment, but proving the destruction of trust is extremely difficult. Merely alleging damage to the trust relationship is not enough.
To prove destruction of the employment relationship the employer needs to show why the employee’s actions would destroy trust in the context of the workplace. It also needs to be proven that the employee was responsible for the alleged criminal act in question. Saying the employee is responsible for the alleged criminal act just because the employee has been arrested, is not enough as the employee is innocent until proven guilty.
To prove a breakdown in the trust relationship before a criminal conviction, the employer would need to prove independently that the employee is guilty of some form of dishonesty. For example, if an employer is a bank and it can be proven the arrested employee was guilty of bank robbery, this is likely to justify the belief that the employee cannot be trusted to work at the bank.
Employers need to make sure that they do not make the same mistake on the dismissal of an arrested employee when the trust relationship has been damaged.

Disclaimer: LabourMan exclusively provides services to employers.

The content does not constitute legal advice, are not intended to be a substitute for legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Kindly contact us on info@labourman.co.za or 021 556 1075 to speak to one of our consultants.

Author:

Wallace Albertyn

Wallace Albertyn is a Senior Associate and Legal Advisor at LabourMan Consultants.

Recent LabourTalk Articles

Giving Notice whilst on Leave

Giving Notice whilst on Leave

Section 37 of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA) governs the termination of employment in South Africa, stipulating specific conditions to protect employees’ rights...

Do Job Titles Really Matter?

Do Job Titles Really Matter?

Introduction There is a lot of debate around the importance of job titles. Some feel they represent your skills and expertise, and some are of the opinion that they are...

LabourTalk Newsletters

Subscribe and receive labour related information

Follow us

Review-Us

 

© 2024 ~ All Rights Reserved  |  Privacy Policy