Formulating allegations against a group of employees

Jul 12, 2017

Describing allegations against one employee during a disciplinary hearing, is the first and most important step when disciplining him/her. However, what if the employer is dealing with a group of employees? How would the employer deal with a situation like that?

To help understand what must be done in a situation like this, here is an actual labour case along with two tips.

CASE: Police and Prisons Civil Rights Unions v Minister of Correctional Services & others (1999) 20 ILJ 2416 (LC)
In this case, there were 44 employees who had 15 charges laid against them.
The union argued that the charges were too vague and so the employees could not prepare for the hearing. For example, one of the charges referred to an intimidating phone call. Now, does this mean that all 44 employees made an intimidating phone call (unlikely), or was it just one of the employees?
The Court confirmed that the charge sheet was too vague and ambiguous for the employees.
The employer then went on to argue that the standard for a disciplinary charge sheet is not the same as for a criminal trial. While the court agreed with this, it made it clear that the employer needed to give the exact facts and sufficient information about the allegations so that each of the accused could prepare accordingly for the case against them.
What can be learned from this case?
Employers should ensure that in a disciplinary hearing involving more than one employee, it needs to deal with the allegations for each employee separately so as to avoid the charges being too general and vague.
Each employee must be given a notification separately with the allegations specific to him and ensure that it is stated when and where the alleged incidents took place.
EXTRA TIP: If an employer later on realises that the initial allegations made do not adequately describe the offence the employee committed, the employer can change them. However, only as long as the chairperson of the disciplinary hearing has not come to a decision yet.
If the employer decides that it is necessary to change the allegation(s), it would have to postpone the hearing so as to give the employee time to prepare accordingly to the changed allegations.

Disclaimer: LabourMan exclusively provides services to employers.

The content does not constitute legal advice, are not intended to be a substitute for legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Kindly contact us on or 021 556 1075 to speak to one of our consultants.


Wallace Albertyn

Wallace Albertyn is a Senior Associate and Legal Advisor at LabourMan Consultants.

Recent LabourTalk Articles

Dealing With a Fraudulent Sick Certificate

Dealing With a Fraudulent Sick Certificate

Increasingly, employees are submitting suspicious medical certificates, and a recent Labour Appeal Court judgment is not reassuring. The case in point is Woolworths (Pty) Ltd v...

Dismissal of Prolonged Cases by the CCMA

Dismissal of Prolonged Cases by the CCMA

Introduction The case of South African Airways(SOC) Limited (in Business Rescue) and Others v National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Members and Others (JA32/2020)...

Understanding Bumping Rights in the Workplace

Understanding Bumping Rights in the Workplace

The concept of bumping in the context of retrenchments is critical for determining the fairness of the selection criteria used by employers when dismissing employees. The...

LabourTalk Newsletters

Subscribe and receive labour related information

Follow us



© 2024 ~ All Rights Reserved  |  Privacy Policy