What to do when a thief cannot be identified in the workplace

Aug 30, 2016

Thieving employees are a huge issue to many businesses across the country, but not for the reason one would expect.
While stealing from an employer is definitely a cause for concern, complications arise because, more often than not, the employer cannot identify the guilty employee. The most sophisticated security measures may be in place, but thieves can be pretty smart too, and can often avoid them.
So what can an employer do in a situation like this? The following case may shed some light on the matter.
In the case of  Chauke & Others v Lee Service Centre CC t/a Leeson Motors (1998) 19 ILJ 1441 (LAC) and RSA Geological Services (a division of De Beers Consolidated Mines Ltd) vs Grogan & Others (2008) 2 BLLR 184 (LC) the employer was struggling with theft in the business, but could not identify the perpetrator. There was a strong feeling that other employees knew about it. The employer went ahead and did what any other employer would do in a similar situation – he consulted with the employees to help identify the culprit.
But none of the employees were willing to identify the culprit, even though the employer had sufficient evidence to suggest they did in fact know who was to blame.
What the court then decided was that dismissing the entire group for not helping the employer was justified, because the relationship between employees and employers is ultimately built on trust.
What can be learnt from this case?
If an employer is struggling with theft in the business and have evidence to suggest that employees might know who the culprit is, then they may be dismissed if they refuse to help identify the culprit.

Disclaimer: LabourMan exclusively provides services to employers.

The content does not constitute legal advice, are not intended to be a substitute for legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Kindly contact us on info@labourman.co.za or 021 556 1075 to speak to one of our consultants.


Wallace Albertyn

Wallace Albertyn is a Senior Associate and Legal Advisor at LabourMan Consultants.

Recent LabourTalk Articles

Dealing With a Fraudulent Sick Certificate

Dealing With a Fraudulent Sick Certificate

Increasingly, employees are submitting suspicious medical certificates, and a recent Labour Appeal Court judgment is not reassuring. The case in point is Woolworths (Pty) Ltd v...

Dismissal of Prolonged Cases by the CCMA

Dismissal of Prolonged Cases by the CCMA

Introduction The case of South African Airways(SOC) Limited (in Business Rescue) and Others v National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Members and Others (JA32/2020)...

Understanding Bumping Rights in the Workplace

Understanding Bumping Rights in the Workplace

The concept of bumping in the context of retrenchments is critical for determining the fairness of the selection criteria used by employers when dismissing employees. The...

LabourTalk Newsletters

Subscribe and receive labour related information

Follow us



© 2024 ~ All Rights Reserved  |  Privacy Policy